It's Easter Sunday. Catholics and other Christians are celebrating the Resurrection of their Savior. And on this sacred day, when Christ's disciples remember the historic event of His reuniting His human body and soul which had been separated by His death on the Cross, the Fitchburg Sentinel & Enterprise has decided to publish homosexual agitprop in the form of an article written by Bonnie J. Toomey and entitled "Why should pink have us seeing red?"
Responding to the controversy which erupted when the president of Abercrombie & Fitch, Jenna Lyons, painted her five year old son's toenails pink, Ms. Toomey writes, "...pink is a beautiful color, and I think it looks great on a guy. It doesn't mean anything. But why do we get so uncomfortable when it comes to boys and pink? Traditions, religions and a patriarchal society have put pink where they want it, not necessarily where it rightfully belongs. My sons wore their sister's costumes and dresses many times..But did it change their gender?...And what if it did? Nature is not nurture, and no matter how hard you try, you can't hold back nature..."
But this is to suggest that homosexuality is genetic, dominant and irreversible. If this were true, then no one would be responsible for deviant sexual acts. The fact remains, however, that psychological therapy has proven to be very successful in diminishing, and in many cases even eliminating, same-sex attraction. Personal testimonies from former homosexuals who were healed from the psychopathology may be found here and here.
Ms. Toomey insists though that, "homosexuality is determined by innate characteristics that contribute to sexual orientation and that cannot be changed through medical or psychiatric treatment." That would indeed come as news to those who have recovered from the psychopathology. But Ms. Toomey wouldn't be interested in their testimonies. For these would produce a crack in her wall of conviction. And Ms. Toomey is not interested in truth. The fact remains, homosexuality is not innate. In fact, Dr. Francis S. Collins, one of the world's leading scientists who works on the cutting edge of DNA, has said that, "Homosexuality is not hardwired..." and "..there is an inescapable component of heritability to many human behavioral traits. For virtually none of them is heredity ever close to predictive." See here.
It is unfortunate that homosexual propagandists like Bonnie Toomey continue to ignore the hard science about homosexuality. Dutch psychologist Gerard J.M. van den Aardweg, Ph.D., a specialist on homosexuality (unlike Ms. Toomey who has no expertise in this area), says that the claim that homosexuality is normal is one of those statements that are "so foolish that only intellectuals could believe them." It is like saying that anorexia nervosa is healthy. See here. Dr. Aardweg notes that, "The term neurotic describes such relationships well. It suggests the ego-centeredness of the relationship; the attention-seeking instead of loving...Neurotic, in short, suggests all kinds of dramas and childish conflicts as well as the basic disinterestedness in the partner, notwithstanding the shallow pretensions of 'love.' Nowhere is there more self-deception in the homosexual than in his representation of himself as a lover. One partner is important to the other only insofar as he satisfies that other's needs. Real, unselfish love for a desired partner would, in fact, end up destroying homosexual 'love'!" (Dr. Gerard J.M. van den Aardweg, The Battle for Normality, Ignatius Press, 1997, pp. 62-63).
Recent data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) show that 1 in 5 sexually active homosexual and bisexual men in America are HIV-positive but that 44% of them don't know it. See here. The health risks associated with the homosexual lifestyle are well documented (see here), but propagandists for the lifestyle - like Ms. Toomey - do not seem to be very concerned about these health risks. For their goal is to convert others to the homosexal ideology through a planned psychological attack in the form of homosexual propaganda.
In her zeal to promote the sodomite cause, Ms. Toomey engages in one falsehood after another. She writes, "It's time we accept the fact that as much as 10 percent of the population..is homosexual." But the ten percent myth, which has been based upon research done by the now totally discredited Alfred Kinsey, has been refuted time and again.
For Ms. Toomey, propagandist for the sodomite culture, "Homosexuality..is not wrong." And she is entitled to her beliefs. As idiotic as they are. I'm sure she actually believes the lifestyle is healthy as well. But those of us who are Christian, Jew and Muslim are entitled to our beliefs as well. Those of us who are authentically Catholic, as opposed to being Catholic in name only, accept the teaching of the Church's Magisterium, as expressed in the Catechism of the Catholic Church:
"Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity, tradition has always declared that 'homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered.' They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved." (2357).
And we do not appreciate a second-rate columnist with absolutely no background in theology or the science of DNA telling us that we are backward simply because we do not buy into her radical homosexual agitprop which insists that homosexuality is innate or hardwired.
That the Sentinel & Enterprise would publish such nonsense on Easter Sunday is shameful. The publication has embarassed itself once again.
Sunday, April 24, 2011
The Sentinel & Enterprise publishes homosexual agitprop from Bonnie J. Toomey
Posted on 7:33 AM by Unknown
Posted in Bonnie J. Toomey, Columnist, Easter Sunday, Enterprise, From, Homosexual Agitprop, propaganda, Publishes, Radical, Second Rate, Sentinel, Sodomite
|
No comments
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment